I'm better known for proposing revisions of housing code to allow for more and better "aging in place", including revisions which would both tighten and ease getting zoning exceptions for "accessory apartments" and "accessory buildings".
How would I ease the process? I'd make it effectively a "shall issue" process, provided certain conditions were met. And how would I tighten the process? I'd make those "certain conditions" include that accessory apartments and accessory buildings could be used to house only members of immediate family, and only for purposes of housing children, or housing elders.
Montgomery County has, in some neighborhoods such as Aspen Hill, suffered significantly as newcomers applied for permits for single-family homes on properties where already there stood a single-family home. This has led to doubling -- or more than doubling, in some cases -- of home sizes. Also, in many cases the occupants of the new space were members of extended families, in many cases with only the most tenuous degrees of relatedness, such as "second cousin twice removed of my daughter-in-law's sister-in-law". Yet by making any claim of relatedness whatsoever, the County code allows occupancy of over seven adults in a single-family detached residential domicile. This lack of definition of "relatedness" has allowed single-family detached houses in established neighborhoods to become worker barracks with paved yards on which are illegally parked the work fleets and incidental trailers full of equipment.
This is what MBAs might call a "horizontal" scheme of residential densification, though it is also illegally a conversion of exclusively single-family residential properties to multi-family mixed residential/light-industrial.
Many such schemes try -- after the fact and after long-term hounding by overworked code-enforcement authorities -- to legitimize themselves by applying for zoning exceptions as "accessory apartments" or "accessory buildings".
The zoning law should be clarified to prohibit such "horizontal" schemes, and instead should legitimize and speed "vertical" establishment of accessory residential zoning exceptions.
In this way, instead of having single-family homes occupied by one broad "family" all of working-age adults of about the same age, and all of their equipment as well, you would have single family homes which actually have only a single family in them. However, that single family might have separate domiciles all on the same property, with one residence for the parent generation, one residence for the child generation, and one residence for the grandchild generation.
Failure to adapt the County Code to allow for this will simply force the creation of even more retirement communities, rather than allowing people in the community to retire in the community.
An article from the Washington Post provides us with an analysis of population trends issued by the US Census.
Due to massive immigration, legal and otherwise, the population of the US is expected to increase from the present 302 millions to about 440 millions by the year 2050. By roughly 2040 "non-hispanic whites" will no longer be the majority. As the "hispanic" birth rate is very high among US-born citizens, and as the massive flows of immigration (legal or otherwise) from Spanish-speaking countries continues, by mid-century the population classified as "hispanic" is expected to at least triple. Non-hispanic "whites" will increase their population by less than 2 percent until about 2030 or 2040 and is expected to show significant declines in population after that time.
The vast majority of US citizens born during the so-called "Baby Boom" elected to reproduce at a rate which would have stabilized US population at about 290 millions around 2020 to 2030 or so, with significant population declines thereafter eventually stabilizing the population at around 150-200 millions, which is widely regarded as "sustainable" with renewable lifestyles and agricultural practices.
From the article:
Hispanics, including immigrants and their descendants as well as U.S.-born residents whose American roots stretch back generations, are expected to account for the most growth among minorities. That population is expected to nearly triple by 2050, growing from about one in six residents to one in three.
The black and Asian populations are each expected to increase about 60 percent, with the black share rising from 14 to 15 percent by 2050 and the Asian share jumping from 5 to 9 percent.
The number of people who identify themselves as being from two or more races is also expected to grow, more than tripling to 16.2 million, or 4 percent of the population.
By contrast, the non-Hispanic, single-race white population is expected to grow by less than 2 percent, reducing its share of the overall population from 66 to 46 percent. That group is projected to decline in the 2030s and 2040s, as more members die than are born in or move to the United States.
However, the 65-and-older population is expected to remain mostly white because of the number of whites born during the post-World War II baby boom. By 2030, all boomers will be 65 or older; by 2050, that age group will have more than doubled and will account for more than one in five residents, compared with one in eight today.
Similarly, the 85-and-older population is expected to more than triple, accounting for about 4 percent of U.S. residents in 2050, compared with fewer than 2 percent today.
The percentage of the population that is of working age will drop from 63 to 57 percent. As is the case with children, the working-age population is projected to become majority-minority before 2050. By mid-century, it is expected to be 30 percent Hispanic, 15 percent black and nearly 10 percent Asian.
With 1 in 5 people projected to be retired people, we need to either revise County code so that these folks can age in place, or we had better build an awful lot of retirement communities so that they can have someplace to live, or perhaps we could just drive them right out of the county.